A good reader cannot be simply defined
by their fluency and level of comprehension. Saying a good reader is defined by
their fluency and comprehension is like saying two blades of grass create a
field. There are many blades of grass that create the field of a good reader.
The other blades of grass in this field are the emphasis on words and the
emotions that your voice carries. The dark blades are the active readers, the
ones who thrive. An active reader is someone who questions the author or text,
looks up the definitions of words they do not know, and is a person who relates
the writing to something in their life.
A good writer cannot be simply defined
by how intriguing their story is or by how complex their vocabulary is. Saying
a good writer is defined by how fascinating their tale is or by how advanced
their vocabulary is like saying two grains of sand makes a beach. The beach of
a good writer requires many grains of sand. The smaller grains of sand are
grammar and spelling, they aren’t very import but the still contribute to the
beach. Other grains are a good climax and exposition, the message the story
portrays, the tone of the story or its characters, and also the organization of
the story.
Both a good reader and a good writer
require many qualities. The best writer is a good reader and the best reader is
a good writer.
No comments:
Post a Comment